Accéder directement au contenu Accéder directement à la navigation
Article dans une revue

Self-correction of science: a comparative study of negative citations and post-publication peer review

Abstract : This study investigates whether negative citations in articles and comments posted on post-publication peer review platforms are both equally contributing to the correction of science. These 2 types of written evidence of disputes are compared by analyzing their occurrence in relation to articles that have already been retracted or corrected. We identified retracted or corrected articles in a corpus of 72,069 articles coming from the Engineering field, from 3 journals (Science, Tumor Biology, Cancer Research) and from 3 authors with many retractions to their credit (Sarkar, Schön, Voinnet). We used Scite to retrieve contradicting citations and PubPeer to retrieve the number of comments for each article, and then we considered them as traces left by scientists to contest published results. Our study shows that contradicting citations are very uncommon and that retracted or corrected articles are not more contradicted in scholarly articles than those that are neither retracted nor corrected but they do generate more comments on Pubpeer, presumably because of the possibility for contributors to remain anonymous. Moreover, post-publication peer review platforms, although external to the scientific publication process contribute more to the correction of science than negative citations. Consequently, post-publication peer review venues, and more specifically the comments found on it, although not contributing to the scientific literature, are a mechanism for correcting science. Lastly, we introduced the idea of strengthening the role of contradicting citations to rehabilitate the clear expression of judgment in scientific papers.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [55 références]  Voir  Masquer  Télécharger

https://hal-enpc.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02778897
Contributeur : Frédérique Bordignon <>
Soumis le : jeudi 4 juin 2020 - 16:37:38
Dernière modification le : lundi 20 juillet 2020 - 16:43:55

Fichier

 Accès restreint
Fichier visible le : 2020-12-04

Connectez-vous pour demander l'accès au fichier

Licence


Distributed under a Creative Commons Paternité 4.0 International License

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Frédérique Bordignon. Self-correction of science: a comparative study of negative citations and post-publication peer review. Scientometrics, Springer Verlag, 2020, 124 (2), pp.1225-1239. ⟨10.1007/s11192-020-03536-z⟩. ⟨hal-02778897⟩

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

96


Données de recherche