Assessing the impact of the EU ETS using firm level data, 2011. ,
Is there a rationale for output-based rebating of environmental levies?, Resource and Energy Economics, vol.29, issue.2, pp.83-101, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2006.07.001
Unilateral climate policy design: Efficiency and equity implications of alternative instruments to reduce carbon leakage, Energy Economics, vol.34, issue.2, pp.208-217, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.09.011
Cost-effective unilateral climate policy design: Size matters, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.67, issue.3, pp.318-339, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2013.12.008
Economic Implications of Alternative Allocation Schemes for Emission Allowances*, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol.12, issue.3, pp.563-581, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.1999.1112
Distortions from Activity Level thresholds in the EU-ETS. Evidence from the cement sector, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economics, 2015. ,
Reaping the carbon rent: Abatement and overallocation profits in the European cement industry, insights from an LMDI decomposition analysis, Energy Economics, vol.47, pp.189-205, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.11.008
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01137935
Carbon Leakage and Competitiveness of Cement and Steel Industries Under the EU ETS: Much Ado About Nothing, The Energy Journal, vol.37, issue.3, pp.2013-53, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.5547/01956574.37.3.fbra
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00945187
External Diseconomies, Corrective Taxes, and Market Structure, The American Economic Review, vol.59, issue.1, pp.174-177, 1969. ,
Grandfathering, auctioning and Carbon Leakage: Assessing the inconsistencies of the new ETS Directive, Energy Policy, vol.38, issue.5, pp.2420-2430, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.035
Tradeable carbon permit auctions, Energy Policy, vol.30, issue.4, pp.333-345, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00100-8
abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS: grandfathering versus output-based allocation, Climate Policy, vol.34, issue.1, pp.93-113, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685590
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00719269
European Emission Trading Scheme and competitiveness: A case study on the iron and steel industry, Energy Economics, vol.30, issue.4, pp.2009-2027, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.01.020
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00719252
Rebating environmental policy revenues: Output-based allocations and tradable performance standards. Resources for the Future, 2001. ,
Market power and output-based refunding of environmental policy revenues, Resource and Energy Economics, vol.33, issue.1, pp.212-230, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2010.04.011
Output-Based Allocation of Emissions Permits for Mitigating Tax and Trade Interactions, Land Economics, vol.83, issue.4, pp.575-599, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.3368/le.83.4.575
On the scope for output-based rebating in climate policy: When revenue recycling isn't enough (or Isn't Possible) Resources for the Future Discussion Paper, pp.10-69, 2010. ,
Comparing policies to combat emissions leakage: Border carbon adjustments versus rebates, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.64, issue.2, pp.199-216, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2012.01.005
Market-based emissions regulation and industry dynamics, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2012. ,
Emission taxes and optimal refunding schemes, Journal of Public Economics, vol.88, issue.3-4, pp.3-4713, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00215-3
Price and welfare effects of emission quota allocation, Energy Economics, vol.36, pp.568-580, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.11.006
Environmental Policy Making in Economies with Prior Tax Distortions, 2002. ,
Allocation and competitiveness in the EU emissions trading scheme: policy overview, Climate Policy, vol.6, issue.3, pp.7-30, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685586
Output-based allocation as a form of protection for internationally competitive industries, Climate Policy, vol.3, pp.29-41, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.clipol.2003.09.009
Effective, efficient or equitable: using allowance allocations to mitigate emissions leakage, Climate Policy, vol.9, issue.6, pp.1113-1130, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685588
Auctioning of EU ETS phase II allowances: How and why? Climate Policy, pp.137-160, 2006. ,
Emissions taxes versus intensity standards: Second-best environmental policies with incomplete regulation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.63, issue.3, pp.375-387, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2011.12.002
Border tax adjustment: a feasible way to support stringent emission trading, European Journal of Law and Economics, vol.32, issue.5, pp.137-164, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s10657-007-9032-8
Allocation of CO2 Emissions Permits: A General Equilibrium Analysis of Policy Instruments, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.40, issue.2, pp.111-136, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.1999.1112
Output-based allocations and revenue recycling: Implications for the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme, Energy Policy, vol.38, issue.12, pp.7861-7872, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.002
The interface between the trade and climate change regimes: Scoping the issues. World Trade Organization Staff Working Paper, 2011. ,
On the empirical content of carbon leakage criteria in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, Ecological Economics, vol.105, pp.78-88, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.010
Carbon leakage and capacity-based allocations: Is the EU right?, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.68, issue.2, pp.262-279, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2014.07.002
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00797234
Use of cement in concrete according to European standard EN 206-1, HBRC Journal, vol.8, issue.1, pp.1-7, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.hbrcj.2012.08.001
Markets in Licences and Efficient Pollution Control Programs, Journal of Economic Theory, pp.385-418, 1972. ,
Allocation, incentives and distortions: the impact of EU ETS emissions allowance allocations to the electricity sector, Climate Policy, vol.6, issue.1, pp.73-91, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685589
Carbon Control and Competitiveness post 2020: The Cement Report, 2014. ,
Historic versus output-based allocation of GHG tradable allowances: a comparison, Climate Policy, vol.86, issue.4, pp.575-592, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685587
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00715558
Issues behind Competitiveness and Carbon Leakage. Focus on Heavy Industry. IEA Information Paper, 2008. ,
Sustainable cement production???present and future, Cement and Concrete Research, vol.41, issue.7, pp.642-650, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.019
Output and abatement effects of allocation readjustment in permit trade, Climatic Change, vol.29, issue.1, pp.33-49, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s10584-007-9281-0
Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach, 2009. ,
Triggers and barriers to energy efficiency measures in the ceramic, cement and lime sectors, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol.69, pp.133-142, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.076
Benchmarking in the European Union Emissions Trading System: Abatement incentives, Energy Economics, vol.43, pp.218-224, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.03.002
Land Competitiveness and Leakage Concerns and Border Carbon Adjusments, 2012. ,