P. Ambrosi, J. Hourcade, S. Hallegatte, F. Lecocq, P. Dumas et al., Optimal Control Models and Elicitation of Attitudes towards Climate Damages, Environmental Modeling and Assessment, vol.8, issue.3, p.133147, 2003.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4419-1129-2_6

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00000966

C. Azar and B. A. Sandén, The elusive quest for technology-neutral policies, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, vol.1, issue.1, p.135139, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eist.2011.03.003

C. Böhringer and K. E. Rosendahl, Green promotes the dirtiest: on the interaction between black and green quotas in energy markets, Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol.19, issue.3, p.316325, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s11149-010-9116-1

N. A. Braathen, Instrument Mixes for Environmental Policy: How Many Stones Should be Used to Kill a Bird?, International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.1, issue.2, p.185235, 2007.
DOI : 10.1561/101.00000005

A. Brook, D. Kendrick, and A. Meeraus, GAMS, a user's guide. SIGNUM Newsl, pp.1011-58863, 1988.

S. J. Davis, K. Caldeira, and H. D. Matthews, Future CO2 Emissions and Climate Change from Existing Energy Infrastructure, Science, vol.329, issue.5997, pp.1330-1333, 2010.
DOI : 10.1126/science.1188566

URL : http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/45b3k4t0

P. Del-rio-gonzalez, Policy implications of potential conicts between short-term and long-term eciency in CO2 emissions abatement, Ecological Economics, vol.65, issue.2, p.292303, 2008.

A. Dixit and L. Lambertini, Interactions of commitment and discretion in monetary and scal policies, The American Economic Review, vol.93, issue.5, p.15221542, 2003.

C. Fischer and L. Preonas, Combining policies for renewable energy: Is the whole less than the sum of its parts?, International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.4, p.5192, 2010.

C. Guivarch and S. Hallegatte, Existing infrastructure and the 2C target, Climatic Change, vol.109, pp.3-4, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00724493

F. Gusdorf, S. Hallegatte, and A. Lahellec, Time and space matter: How urban transitions create inequality, Global Environmental Change, vol.18, issue.4, p.708719, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.06.005

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00719283

M. Jaccard and N. Rivers, Heterogeneous capital stocks and the optimal timing for CO2 abatement, Resource and Energy Economics, vol.29, issue.1, p.116, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2006.03.002

T. Jackson, Least-cost greenhouse planning supply curves for global warming abatement, Energy Policy, vol.19, issue.1, p.3546, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/0301-4215(91)90075-Y

T. M. Johnson, C. Alatorre, Z. Romo, and F. Liu, Low-Carbon development for mexico, 2009.
DOI : 10.1596/978-0-8213-8122-9

M. Kalkuhl, O. Edenhofer, and K. Lessmann, Learning or lock-in: Optimal technology policies to support mitigation, Resource and Energy Economics, vol.34, issue.1, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.08.001

F. Kesicki, Intertemporal issues and marginal abatement costs in the UK transport sector, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol.17, issue.5, p.418426, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.trd.2012.04.002

F. Kesicki, Marginal Abatement Cost Curves: Combining Energy System Modelling and Decomposition Analysis, Environmental Modeling & Assessment, vol.17, issue.5, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/s10666-012-9330-6

F. Kesicki and P. Ekins, Marginal abatement cost curves: a call for caution, Climate Policy, vol.7, issue.2, p.219236, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61714-1

G. Klepper and S. Peterson, Marginal abatement cost curves in general equilibrium: The inuence of world energy prices, Resource and Energy Economics, vol.28, issue.1, p.123, 2006.

F. E. Kydland and E. C. Prescott, Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans, Journal of Political Economy, vol.85, issue.3, p.473492, 1977.
DOI : 10.1086/260580

F. E. Kydland and E. C. Prescott, Time to build and aggregate uctuations, Econometrica, vol.50, issue.6, p.13451370, 1982.

J. Laont, Political economy, information, and incentives, European Economic Review, vol.43, issue.649669, 1999.

F. Lecocq, J. Hourcade, H. Duong, and M. , Decision making under uncertainty and inertia constraints: sectoral implications of the when flexibility, Energy Economics, vol.20, issue.5-6, pp.5-6, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-9883(98)00012-7

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00002458

H. D. Matthews, N. P. Gillett, P. A. Stott, and K. Zickfeld, The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions, Nature, vol.104, issue.7248, p.829832, 2009.
DOI : 10.1038/nature08047

C. Mckinsey, Pathways to a low-carbon economy: Version 2 og the global greenhouse gas abatement cost curve. executive summary, 2009.

D. Rodrik, Normalizing industrial policy. Commission for Growth and Development, Working Paper, vol.3, 2008.

E. S. Rubin, R. N. Cooper, R. A. Frosch, T. H. Lee, G. Marland et al., Realistic Mitigation Options for Global Warming, Science, vol.257, issue.5067, p.148149, 1992.
DOI : 10.1126/science.257.5067.148

S. Consortium, Scilab: The free software for numerical computation. Scilab Consortium, 2011.

S. E. Stoft, The Economics of Conserved-Energy "Supply" Curves, The Energy Journal, vol.16, issue.4, p.109140, 1995.
DOI : 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol16-No4-5

J. Sweeney and J. Weyant, Analysis of measures to meet the requirements of california's assembly bill 32, 2008.

A. Vogt-schilb, G. Meunier, and S. Hallegatte, How inertia and limited potentials aect the timing of sectoral abatements in optimal climate policy, Policy Research Working Paper, vol.6154, 2012.

W. Bank, Doing Business, 2010.